RSS feeds without item publication dates show in reverse order
1 followers
0 Likes
Hi
I was rather hoping this was going to be fixed in the new release. When one adds an RSS feed it shows with the oldest feed item first. Please could this be reversed so that the most recent news items appears at the top of the list.
Also once one has added an RSS feed, does it update automatically?
Many thanks
Madeleine
5 Replies
Reply
Subgroup Membership is required to post Replies
Join Groupsite Champions now
Suggested Posts
Topic | Replies | Likes | Views | Participants | Last Reply |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GroupSite used as a web page | 3 | 0 | 2310 | ||
Delete or suspend? | 4 | 0 | 1589 | ||
Designing your GroupSite Header | 5 | 0 | 3104 |
Hey Madeleine,
We're not able to see the issue that you're reporting here: embedded RSS feeds have always had their posts always been ordered from newest to oldest. Perhaps the feed itself is reporting invalid data?
If you can give me the URL for the feed that you've been experiencing this with, I can take a look at it for you.
Thanks for looking into this Joe.
I've tried it with various feeds. Here are two of them
http://www.orionbooks.co.uk/newsRSS.aspx
http://www.jrf.org.uk/rss/reports.xml.asp
Also the date that appears next to the headline is the date it is collected by the Groupsite, rather than the date it was posted on the rss feed.
Many thanks
Madeleine
No problem at all. Here's what I've discovered:
Madeleine,
Feeds without any publication dates on their entries will now be added in the order they were received from the feed. Hopefully this resolves all of the issues you were having with feeds. Also, in the interest of clarity, no publication date will be shown on a feed entry that does not have one (previously, it would've shown the date that it was refreshed into the system). If there ever comes a time where some feed out there mixes and matches entries with and without publication dates, the result will likely be out-of-order. Really, there is no good reason for a feed to do that, so I don't think it's likely to be a real issue.
Thanks so much Joe for resolving this one. I think you've come up with a good solution that covers all reasonable eventualities.